phototestcenter.com

review center 11 Lens reviews raw software gold Photo printers reviews gold
[Home] [Review Center] [RAW Software Reviews] [Lens Tests] [Photo Printer Reviews] [About Phototestcenter] [The MAC Page] [Winter Light] [Working For a Living]

Sigma 18-125mm f3.5 - 5.6 DC

This test is based on a Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 DC tested with a Canon EOS 20D at Photokina 2006.

The Sigma 18-125mm f3.5-5.6 DC lens is roughly equivalent to the very popular 28-200mm range with 35mm film cameras, so although the numbers may seem unfamiliar, this lens covers pretty much all you’ll need in one lens. While that always sounds like a great idea it usually comes with fairly large performance drawbacks, as, in general, the wider the zoom range of a lens, the lower the image quality. Over the last few years the difference, especially if you only take pictures in good light, has got much smaller. The use of moulded plastic aspherical elements that lens designers of 20 years ago could only dream of has made lenses like this possible. So if you want something better than the kit lens, and with a wider range, is this a good alternative?

The Sigma 18-125mm f3.5-5.6 DC lens is designed for use solely on digital SLR cameras - it can’t be used with film cameras or full frame sensor DSLR’s. This lens is aimed at the Digital Rebel / Canon 300D / Pentax *ist DS market. The lens feels very light and fairly plasticy - Similar to most kit lenses, and like them, although all the controls work smoothly, it doesn’t really ooze quality. On the plus side, as always, Sigma do give you a decent lens hood in the box.

Sigma 18-125

photo courtesy of Sigma

review center blue grey 150 lens home blue grey

Optically the performance is fine if you’re looking for something a step up from a compact and don’t want a bag full of lenses. In fact performance is similar to the Canon 18-55 EF-S with fairly good central sharpness but a very obvious fall in resolution away from the center of the field. Even in the middle of the range at f5.6 the corners are fairly soft. One other drawback shared by most lenses of this type is higher than average distortion levels - Barrel distortion is very noticeable at the wide end of the zoom so any buildings you photograph will have a few extra curves. All zoom lenses involve compromises but unless you really need the wide range the Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 is a much better lens all round for about the same money. This isn’t a bad lens really, but there are many better options out there.

Sigma 18-125 DC user reviews at photographyreview.com

review center 11 Lens reviews raw software gold Photo printers reviews gold
[Home] [Review Center] [RAW Software Reviews] [Lens Tests] [Photo Printer Reviews] [About Phototestcenter] [The MAC Page] [Winter Light] [Working For a Living]

All text and images copyright David Gold 2006
and must not be reproduced in any way without permission

>