phototestcenter.com               RAW  

Nikon D70 - 1600 ISO

Image Quality :  1600 ISO  :  All shown at 100%

Nikon D70 _DSC9221 NC NX 1600 NR

Nikon Capture NX

Nikon D70_DSC9221 ACDSee 1600 NR on

ACDSee Pro 8

Nikon D70_DSC9221 Bibble 1600 NR 5_4

Bibble

Nikon D70     _DSC9221 Rawshooter 1600

RAWshooter

NEF plug in _DSC9221 D70 1600

Nikon NEF Photoshop Plug In

Nikon D70_DSC9221 1600 ACR

Adobe Camera RAW

Nikon D70_DSC9221  1600 Capture One

Capture One

Nikon D70_DSC9221 Silkypix 1600

Silkypix

1600 ISO

The Nikon D70 does start to show a fair amount of noise at 1600 ISO - It’s better than most Nikons at this speed but far noisier than Canon DSLRs. For that reason, all results here are with the application’s noise reduction turned on. Apart, that is, from the Nikon NEF plug-in which has no controls other than lighten / darken and color temperature.  Equal last at 1600 ISO come Adobe Camera RAW and Silkypix, which although they both have noise reduction, still show far more noise than the others. In Adobe Camera RAW’s case this shows up as quite noticeable odd white artifacts in shadow areas, while with Silkypix areas of wood grain in the test image start to develop colored spots that none of the other applications replicate. Of the rest, I’d still rate Bibble as the best, although results do show a fair amount of noise even with the built in Noise Ninja.  However, the noise looks much like film grain and sharpness is excellent, so unlike the odd effects with ACR and Silkypix, this isn’t so noticeable.  Nikon Capture NX comes second equal with ACDSee which both show very good noise reduction performance with only a slight loss of detail. The Nikon result is perhaps a bit too smooth for my taste, while ACDSee’s excellent noise reduction strikes a better balance with better sharpness at the cost of a little more noise. Capture One would be an excellent choice for portraiture with the smoothest result of all, but at the expense of some loss of sharpness and detail. RawShooter produces a good result but color noise is visible in smooth toned areas and sharpness isn’t as good as the best.  The Nikon NEF plug-in result is perfectly acceptable and at 1600 ISO better than Silkypix or ACR, but it lacks sharpness and again has slightly less detail than the others.

Next Page :  Conclusions

© David Gold
All text and images copyright David Gold 2006 - 2010
and must not be reproduced in any way without permission.
Contact

>